Before 1954, our pledge of allegiance described America as, “…one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all…” Then Congress added “…under God…” Two years later, they adopted “In God we trust” as our national motto. Now a movement is under way to place that motto on public buildings and patrol cars. Why? And why now?
Congress was clearly motivated by a desire to distinguish us from the officially atheist and communist USSR. Their trust didn’t extend to national defense. They were simultaneously building an arsenal of nuclear weapons to assure that we could destroy the Soviet Union if they attacked us. Although congress didn’t specify which god they trusted, it was a conservative Christian initiative. The reason seemed to be that many Americans took comfort in the idea that God would protect a Christian nation.
Previously, the unofficial motto of the United States was “E pluribus unum” which translates as “One from many”. It referred to one nation emerging from thirteen colonies which had diverse values, religious traditions and laws. It has also been used to describe American national unity among people of various races, cultures, beliefs and religions.
Today’s environment seems similar to that of the 1950s. Fear that Muslim and Latino immigrants will bring terrorism and crime is front and center in our political discussions. A second, and perhaps more powerful concern is that many Americans see the US as a “Christian nation” and they fear that we are becoming something else. The Christian Action League which lobbies to have the motto placed on patrol cars and public buildings obviously thinks the motto refers to the god of evangelical Christians. So do many of the local groups who get financial support from the In God We Trust Action Committee. It has national and state organizations that encourage and pay for the signs and decals.
It seems appropriate to ask, “How is trust in god visible? What does it mean on a public building?” If the nation trusts a god, what is it that we are trusting that deity to do? Regardless of belief (or non-belief) I’d bet that most of us will call for help from a skilled law enforcement officer in a crisis rather than waiting for one deity or another to fix the problem.
I went looking for answers in holy books of the world’s two largest religions. The Christian Bible has a great many admonitions to trust God and live by his rules. Beyond that it is unclear what trust means. The texts that I found are about living life with trust in God – fearlessly. None suggested advertising trust on money, buildings or law enforcement chariots.
In the Quran I found similar messages. Since few Americans are familiar with that book, here are a couple of examples, [3:159-160] “… GOD loves those who trust in Him. If GOD supports you, none can defeat you. And if He abandons you, who else can support you?” “[11:123] To GOD belongs the future of the heavens and the earth, and all matters are controlled by Him. You shall worship Him and trust in Him.” As with the Christian Bible, trust seemed to be about living life with trust in God – fearlessly, not about public displays.
What then, is the motivation for public displays?
Until I hear a more convincing rationale for the signs and decals there are three possibilities that come to mind.
- Perhaps proponents hope that signs or decals will convince their God to intervene in the world to protect them.
- Perhaps they want to offend non-believers and those who worship a different version of God. Maybe they think they can discourage other beliefs by posting their own on law enforcement vehicles and public buildings. (That kind of thinking is exactly why we have a constitutional amendment prohibiting government preference for any religion.)
- Another possibility is that the proponents lack sufficient trust in their own God so they seek validation and support in the form of government-approved signs.
Maybe there are other reasons that are best stated by those who have made decisions to put the motto on display. I prefer “E pluribus unum”. It describes the confidence of a nation that will be great in the future as it has been in the past rather than the fears of a nation whose faith is weak.
Excellent piece, Bob, at least for me. Words just get bantied around and people don’t really define what the words mean. I am confounded about this notion of religion and peoples throughout history always trying to change other peoples’ beliefs. And I don’t get it. I think it must be a power grab, with religions in cahoots with governments. (I have my own strong beliefs but would never expect anyone else to believe as I do, nor can I even define my beliefs.) I really wish we could all talk about this stuff the way you are doing in your post. Thanks!
I have been studying religion and human behavior for 45 years, from inside Christianity and as a Free Thinker. I will speak my remarks as a believer although I no longer am. Life runs this way as I see it: You cannot deny people’s obvious need for some kind of structure in how we view life. The greatest need appears to be fear of the unknown. We are as ants in a world that is way too dynamic and threatening for ordinary people to know which way to defend themselves.
This goes beyond believing that one is safe because they practice a religion that promises security and organization. Fear still lurks in the activities beyond our control. Once we humans have found a safe haven among “believers” we seek ways to communicate to the greater outside world to calm down and look up to join with believers because we have found the “way” and banding together, we suggest a threat to anyone who tries to overpower us physically, politically or spiritually.
The word God is a unifying term among the many different styles of belief. But religious people are seen going way overboard beyond what their prophets have given as the way to live. Finding life to overwhelming to begin with, and discovering a psychological means of mental stability and confidence in religion, we feel threatened again by a larger world than ours. In America today religious people seek safety in political organizations and self defense. They wish the whole world to believe their way so that threats may no longer exist. Unfortunately virtually every major religion has a calling to convert the other religions and “infidels”. Never far from the surface they all suggest violence to either defend their turf or expand it.
Placing GOD on police cars shows ownership and the threat of incarceration to outsiders. Constitutionally, believers do not own the police, but they wish to show a unity behind their defenders. That is my observation and I form my conclusions accordingly.